Economists Still Forecast Housing Growth in 2010

August 2nd, 2010

Economists may have pared their housing growth expectations for 2010 in the face of weak production following the expiration of housing tax credits at the end of April. But they are still calling for, on average, a 15% increase in housing starts this year based on the belief that employment prospects will brighten later in the year.

The 15% consensus increase, gleaned from the forecasts of six leading housing economists, is a far cry from the 20% to 50% surge in housing production that economists were calling for as the year began. Those predictions were based, among other factors, on the 20% acceleration of housing starts from January through October 2009.

The speed-up continued on pace through the first four months of 2010. But after the expiration of home buyer tax credits, which apparently pulled forward demand, housing starts slowed dramatically to a meager 549,000 seasonally adjusted rate in June. That’s below the 554,000 homes started last year.

Slow job growth, weakness in the overall economy, and continued deflation in home prices have forced adjustments in forecasts. But housing economists remain very bullish about the industry’s prospects later this year and into 2011. 

Average forecast calls for a 15% increase in starts in 2010
  2009 Starts 2010 Forecast Increase 2011 Forecast Increase from 2010
NAHB 554,000 632,000 14% 906,000 44%
IHS Global Insight 554,000 638,000 14% 962,000 51%
Freddie Mac 554,000 660,000 19% 1,000,000 52%
Wachovia 554,000 580,000 5% 850,000 47%
Moody’s 554,000 672,000 21% 932,000 39%
Fannie Mae 554,000 648,000 17% 932,000 44%

The NAHB, for instance, expects a 14% increase in housing starts this year. Chief Economist David Crowe believes that housing construction “will slowly improve throughout the second half of this year and into next year, bolstered by continued low mortgage rates, affordable housing prices, and an improving jobs market.”

In his latest economic note, Crowe put a positive spin on the June figures for total housing starts. First, he noted that single-family starts barely moved, “suggesting that they are at or near bottom.” Second, he said the monthly numbers for multifamily activity, which are typically very volatile, don’t look so bad when adjusted for quarterly activity.

IHS Global Insight was one of the most optimistic forecasters at the beginning of the year, calling for a 49% increase in housing starts. Chief Economist Patrick Newport now expects only a 14% increase in 2010 to 638,000 starts, followed by big increases in 2011 (962,000, or 51%) and 2012 (1,347,000, or 40%).

“The key for housing going forward is job growth,” says Newport, who expects the economy to add about 800,000 jobs in 2010, followed by 2.7 million, and 3.5 million increases in 2011 and 2012. Through June, the private sector had added 593,000 jobs, though employment remains 7.9 million below December 2007 levels, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“The household formation rate will pick up once job growth takes off,” Newport says. “Increases in the household formation rate, in turn, will reduce the housing glut, and this will stimulate new construction.”

Freddie Mac Chief Economist Frank Nothaft remains among the most optimistic of housing forecasters. He’s still calling for a 19% increase in new home starts this year to 660,000. He believes that low mortgage rates, more affordable home prices, and an improving jobs outlook “should keep the trend in sales generally headed upwards toward year end and into 2011.”

Nothaft also has one of the most bullish forecasts going forward. He projects that housing starts will rise to 1 million next year, 1.5 million in 2012, and 1.8 million in 2013.

By contrast, Wachovia’s Mark Vitner has emerged as one of the most bearish housing forecasters. He expects housing starts to eke out only a 5% gain this year, due to summer weakness, though he’s calling for a big increase to 850,000 units next year. His forecast is contained in Wachovia’s Monthly Outlook.

“We now expect residential construction outlays to fall 7.5% during the third quarter but then look for a legitimate recovery in home sales and new home construction to finally take hold later this year,” says Wachovia’s July edition. 

The economists at Fannie Mae believe that job security will be the key to housing’s turnaround, even though housing is affordable now due to low mortgage rates and nominal housing prices. “As long as households are concerned about job security, affordability will not be the biggest driver of housing demand,” write Chief Economist Doug Duncan and Orawin T. Velz in their July forecast.

Another drag, the Fannie Mae economists say, will come from homeowners who owe more on their mortgage than their house is worth. Five million homeowners had a mortgage with a loan-to-value of 125% or more in the first quarter of the year, according to First American CoreLogic.

Nevertheless, Fannie Mae still forecasts a 17% increase in housing starts this year to a 648,000 level, and a 44% increase to 932,000 starts next year.

PMI, the mortgage insurer, recently cut its 2010 new home sales forecast in half. Going into the year, the group was calling for a 19.9% increase in new home sales. Now, it only forecasts 9.4% growth. David Berson, the former chief economist at Fannie Mae, leads the forecast team at PMI.

“The expiration of the second tax credit has hit housing activity hard,” PMI wrote in its latest newsletter, “after having drawn sales forward into March and April. Moreover, all of the near-term leading indicators of housing activity suggest no pickup in coming months (and perhaps even additional declines.)”

PMI is predicting a 48.7% increase in new-home sales next year, though.

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s.com, said at our Housing Leadership Summit in May that housing starts should reach about 700,000 this year, then rise to 1 million in 2011, and about 1.7 million in 2012. He described 1.7 million housing starts as consistent with demographics in a normally functioning economy.

Zandi recently said on PBS that the housing market appears to be “double-dipping.” He told PBS audiences that house prices will continue to decline this year as foreclosure sales and short sales pick up later in the year.

Nevertheless, Zandi has one of the more optimistic forecasts for growth this year. Moody’s expects starts to finish 2010 21% higher than the year before.

By:Boyce Thompson

http://www.builderonline.com/economic-conditions/economists-still-forecast-housing-growth-in-2010.aspx

www.dvwise.com

Mortgage rates remain at lowest level in decades

July 26th, 2010

 Mortgage rates were unchanged this week at the lowest point in decades, but it hasn’t been enough to jump-start the housing market.

Government-sponsored mortgage buyer Freddie Mac said Thursday the average rate for 30-year fixed loans this week was 4.57 percent. That’s the same as a week earlier and the lowest since Freddie Mac began tracking rates in 1971.

The last time home loan rates were lower was the 1950s, when most mortgages lasted just 20 or 25 years.

Rates have fallen since the spring. Investors, concerned with the European debt crisis, have poured money into the safety of Treasury bonds. Treasury yields have fallen and so have mortgage rates, which tend to track yields on U.S. debt.

However, low rates have yet to fuel home sales and have sparked only a modest increase in refinancing activity.

The housing market has slowed since federal tax credits for homebuyers expired at the end of April. And the latest decline in mortgage rates is unlikely to boost the market.

Mortgage rates have hovered near record lows for some time, so most people who can afford to buy homes or qualify to refinance their loans have already done so in the past 18 months. Doing so again wouldn’t be worth the cost for most.

Meanwhile, millions of Americans are unable to take advantage of the low rates. Many have seen the value of their homes plummet and have little or no equity. Or they lack good credit or steady income to get or refinance a mortgage.

Rates could go lower and still not budge the housing market, analysts say. That’s because a person without a job can’t afford a home and a person worried about losing their job is unlikely to do so either.

To calculate the national average, Freddie Mac collects mortgage rates on Monday through Wednesday of each week from lenders around the country. Rates often fluctuate significantly, even within a given day.

Rates on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages decreased to an average of 4.06 percent, down from 4.07 percent last week. Rates on five-year adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 3.85 percent, up from 3.75 percent a week earlier.

Rates on one-year adjustable-rate mortgages fell to an average of 3.74 percent from 3.75 percent.

The rates do not include add-on fees known as points. One point is equal to 1 percent of the total loan amount. The nationwide fee for all types of loans in Freddie Mac’s survey averaged 0.7 a point.

by Alan Zibel,  AP

www.dvwise.com

What Young Women Want Is Key to Emerging Housing Demand

July 18th, 2010

The housing market is about to see a major youth infusion from members of Generation Y moving into households of their own, but what kind of homes they will want or be able to afford are among the open questions that will be especially challenging for established builders who may be ill-equipped to respond to the magnitude of the changes likely to characterize the recovery period that lies ahead.

Turning the tables on young men, young women will be the demographic group to watch, as they come to the housing market better educated and with higher paying jobs than their male counterparts.

In an NAHB webinar on June 30, James Chung, president of Reach Advisors, cited some demographic statistics about the U.S. population that ought to have an especially upbeat ring in the ears of the developers of multifamily rental properties. However, he cautioned that the dynamics of the marketplace will be dramatically different.

“The demographic winds have clearly changed for residential real estate,” Chung said, “from massive tail winds to massive head winds ahead. The good news is that multifamily still has some tail winds ahead after the storm subsides, much more so than other sorts of real estate, but the wind in the sails will be different from the past.”

Less Money to Spend on Housing

Nobody quite knows for sure how the emerging economy will color the behavior of consumers, but as the U.S. population begins to get back on its feet financially it is unlikely that typical housing consumers will have the wherewithal they once had to spend on housing.

In terms of household income, statistics from the Census Bureau depict a decade in which the top 10% captured 50% of all U.S. earnings and the top 1% landed 25%, he said. In inflation-adjusted dollars, from 2000 to 2008 incomes were down for every age group up through the younger half of the baby boom, those aged 45 to 54, who saw their median income plunge almost 12%.

The younger baby boomers, the large majority of whom are well-established home owners, will be able to soften that blow by falling back on healthy amounts of home equity, according to Chung. But that won’t be the case for Generation Y members, who have feet planted in both the 15-to-24-year and 25-to-34 age groups, both of which experienced a decline in median household income in the 7% to 8% range through 2008.

Born roughly in the 1980s through 1990s, members of Gen Y had actually been spending more than prior generations at their age even though they had less income than those who had preceded them, Chung said. But their high-spending ways began fizzling out with the onset of the recession, he said, as the subsidies they had been receiving from their parents started “shrinking fast.”

The nation’s current job situation remains at detrimental levels for housing, Chung reminded his audience, with roughly 20% of the workforce out of work, underemployed or so discouraged that it has dropped out. Returning to full-employment will need some time, maybe not as long as the decade or more the Japanese took to recover following the collapse of their financial institutions in the 1990s, he said, but that scenario is a more likely outcome for today’s precarious U.S. economy than the rapid job creation that used to occur in the aftermath of recessions.

What young women are able to earn in the period ahead and how well they fare on their career paths will have implications for housing, he indicated, perhaps enabling them to pass more quickly than expected through the upper end of multifamily rentals into the first-time buyer market.

The amount of support that prospective renters and buyers receive from the economy remains a major unknown, but Chung laid out some demographic numbers and market research on Gen Y that builders should be digesting now.

U.S. Population Keeps on Growing

The best news the demographics have to offer housing is that the U.S. population, unlike in most other industrialized countries, will continue on an upward march, growing from 300 million five years ago to 350 million 15 years from now and 400 million in maybe 25 years from today.

However, part of the challenge, he said is that this boost will be coming from segments of the population that don’t have the highest incomes. The number of individuals of mixed race will be growing the fastest — by about 150% — over the quarter-century span when the population shoots from 300 million to 400 million. The mean household income of that group is below the income of whites and Asian Americans. The second fastest growing group by race will be Hispanics — with a surge of about 120% — and they earn far less even than Americans of two or more races.

Appearing prominently in this population mix along with aging baby boomers, multifamily developers definitely have to pay attention to Gen Y because it is accounting for the bulk of demand in the rental housing market. Those in the prime renting age bracket of 22 to 30 will grow 17% from 2000 until 2020, when they will peak at more than 40 million strong, higher than the previous peak in 1985 fueled by the boomers.

Members of Gen Y are coming under income constraints not only because they are young but also because they increasingly belong to lower-earning racial groups. Forty-five percent of this generation is not Caucasian.

Gender Counts

But Gen Y is also where gender comes into play and women are achieving more than men, reversing the income gap between the sexes in the workplace. In 1972, men were 1.5 times more likely to earn a college degree than women; today it is the exact opposite, he said.

Women working full-time receive only 79% of the pay men earn on average, but single women in their 20s working in an urban environment are earning 105% of what their male counterparts are earning, and in some markets their paychecks are 120% of the men’s, he said.

As a result, multifamily builders can expect to see more young women popping up, especially where they are renting a higher-end premium product, Chung said. Additionally, these women are taking a longer time to get married and have children, and this is “dramatically shifting the demand and need for housing, reshaping rental housing demand as they go through the cycle.”

Multifamily rentals will also be running into some competition from homeownership among Gen Y women, part of a more general trend in which single women are accounting for 20% to 25% of first-time home purchases. As the job market tightens up, Gen Y women are likely to be a primary market for first homes.

Even so, Chung indicated that Gen Y women aren’t always easy to read. Despite their higher incomes, “their preferences are different,” he said. In studies of their values “they are much more willing and thoughtful about making tradeoffs and less willing to spend more.” They are more fiscally conservative than young men.

They are also responsive to housing that provides security and that enables them to create their own environment.

“A feeling of safety and security is huge,” he said, “and not to be underestimated. It’s not just about lock systems, but ways you can signal safety and security, and beyond the four walls,” such as feeling safe when jogging in the morning or evening.

Little details are also important. “Young women are many more times likely to read for pleasure than young men,” said Chung. “As you shrink space, this has implications for what built-ins you want to have, what you put on the coffee table in marketing. The differences between the sexes are getting much bigger than seen in the past,” including how they spend their leisure time. “And we haven’t seen how this will be playing out.”

Consumers Are Up in the Air

With men and women alike, builders are going to have to grapple with “fissures in consumer behavior,” according to Chung. “This is the first time we have seen so many consumer decisions up in the air.” Consumers are rethinking their prior brand preferences, their aspirations, where they want to focus their spending and where they are shaving it.

Also bridging gender differences, members of Gen Y have “technological expectations well beyond the rest of us,” he said. “They are using that to customize their lives on line and off line; their relationship to the digital world is different.”

In a generational split with the baby boomers, Chung said that demand for outdoor recreational amenities is softening among Gen Y at the same time that baby boomers continue to strenuously push for it. “A shift is going on,” he said.

Chung said that there are now markets in the country where the dynamics look favorable for new residential development. However, “there is very little correlation between construction and fundamental demand drivers.”

The real correlation is between home building and the availability of credit, which is notably lacking at the current time. “People are on the sidelines waiting to build,” he said, and when the necessary capital does arrive there will probably be a spike. “Capital availability will open up faster for multifamily,” he predicted, “because the fundamentals in many markets are better for multifamily.”

Source: NAHB

www.dvwise.com