Posts Tagged ‘green builders huntersville’

Economists Still Forecast Housing Growth in 2010

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

Economists may have pared their housing growth expectations for 2010 in the face of weak production following the expiration of housing tax credits at the end of April. But they are still calling for, on average, a 15% increase in housing starts this year based on the belief that employment prospects will brighten later in the year.

The 15% consensus increase, gleaned from the forecasts of six leading housing economists, is a far cry from the 20% to 50% surge in housing production that economists were calling for as the year began. Those predictions were based, among other factors, on the 20% acceleration of housing starts from January through October 2009.

The speed-up continued on pace through the first four months of 2010. But after the expiration of home buyer tax credits, which apparently pulled forward demand, housing starts slowed dramatically to a meager 549,000 seasonally adjusted rate in June. That’s below the 554,000 homes started last year.

Slow job growth, weakness in the overall economy, and continued deflation in home prices have forced adjustments in forecasts. But housing economists remain very bullish about the industry’s prospects later this year and into 2011. 

Average forecast calls for a 15% increase in starts in 2010
  2009 Starts 2010 Forecast Increase 2011 Forecast Increase from 2010
NAHB 554,000 632,000 14% 906,000 44%
IHS Global Insight 554,000 638,000 14% 962,000 51%
Freddie Mac 554,000 660,000 19% 1,000,000 52%
Wachovia 554,000 580,000 5% 850,000 47%
Moody’s 554,000 672,000 21% 932,000 39%
Fannie Mae 554,000 648,000 17% 932,000 44%

The NAHB, for instance, expects a 14% increase in housing starts this year. Chief Economist David Crowe believes that housing construction “will slowly improve throughout the second half of this year and into next year, bolstered by continued low mortgage rates, affordable housing prices, and an improving jobs market.”

In his latest economic note, Crowe put a positive spin on the June figures for total housing starts. First, he noted that single-family starts barely moved, “suggesting that they are at or near bottom.” Second, he said the monthly numbers for multifamily activity, which are typically very volatile, don’t look so bad when adjusted for quarterly activity.

IHS Global Insight was one of the most optimistic forecasters at the beginning of the year, calling for a 49% increase in housing starts. Chief Economist Patrick Newport now expects only a 14% increase in 2010 to 638,000 starts, followed by big increases in 2011 (962,000, or 51%) and 2012 (1,347,000, or 40%).

“The key for housing going forward is job growth,” says Newport, who expects the economy to add about 800,000 jobs in 2010, followed by 2.7 million, and 3.5 million increases in 2011 and 2012. Through June, the private sector had added 593,000 jobs, though employment remains 7.9 million below December 2007 levels, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“The household formation rate will pick up once job growth takes off,” Newport says. “Increases in the household formation rate, in turn, will reduce the housing glut, and this will stimulate new construction.”

Freddie Mac Chief Economist Frank Nothaft remains among the most optimistic of housing forecasters. He’s still calling for a 19% increase in new home starts this year to 660,000. He believes that low mortgage rates, more affordable home prices, and an improving jobs outlook “should keep the trend in sales generally headed upwards toward year end and into 2011.”

Nothaft also has one of the most bullish forecasts going forward. He projects that housing starts will rise to 1 million next year, 1.5 million in 2012, and 1.8 million in 2013.

By contrast, Wachovia’s Mark Vitner has emerged as one of the most bearish housing forecasters. He expects housing starts to eke out only a 5% gain this year, due to summer weakness, though he’s calling for a big increase to 850,000 units next year. His forecast is contained in Wachovia’s Monthly Outlook.

“We now expect residential construction outlays to fall 7.5% during the third quarter but then look for a legitimate recovery in home sales and new home construction to finally take hold later this year,” says Wachovia’s July edition. 

The economists at Fannie Mae believe that job security will be the key to housing’s turnaround, even though housing is affordable now due to low mortgage rates and nominal housing prices. “As long as households are concerned about job security, affordability will not be the biggest driver of housing demand,” write Chief Economist Doug Duncan and Orawin T. Velz in their July forecast.

Another drag, the Fannie Mae economists say, will come from homeowners who owe more on their mortgage than their house is worth. Five million homeowners had a mortgage with a loan-to-value of 125% or more in the first quarter of the year, according to First American CoreLogic.

Nevertheless, Fannie Mae still forecasts a 17% increase in housing starts this year to a 648,000 level, and a 44% increase to 932,000 starts next year.

PMI, the mortgage insurer, recently cut its 2010 new home sales forecast in half. Going into the year, the group was calling for a 19.9% increase in new home sales. Now, it only forecasts 9.4% growth. David Berson, the former chief economist at Fannie Mae, leads the forecast team at PMI.

“The expiration of the second tax credit has hit housing activity hard,” PMI wrote in its latest newsletter, “after having drawn sales forward into March and April. Moreover, all of the near-term leading indicators of housing activity suggest no pickup in coming months (and perhaps even additional declines.)”

PMI is predicting a 48.7% increase in new-home sales next year, though.

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s.com, said at our Housing Leadership Summit in May that housing starts should reach about 700,000 this year, then rise to 1 million in 2011, and about 1.7 million in 2012. He described 1.7 million housing starts as consistent with demographics in a normally functioning economy.

Zandi recently said on PBS that the housing market appears to be “double-dipping.” He told PBS audiences that house prices will continue to decline this year as foreclosure sales and short sales pick up later in the year.

Nevertheless, Zandi has one of the more optimistic forecasts for growth this year. Moody’s expects starts to finish 2010 21% higher than the year before.

By:Boyce Thompson

http://www.builderonline.com/economic-conditions/economists-still-forecast-housing-growth-in-2010.aspx

www.dvwise.com

Even Smart Builders Continue to Neglect the Attic

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Chances are that you design and build your houses with a vented attic. This is the most preferred (and affordable) method of construction for most builders, and if you’re in the right climate, it’s perfectly fine. But a growing number of researchers say many builders aren’t doing a good enough job to make the space energy-efficient.

I recently discovered how important the attic space is to the overall energy efficiency of a house when I had an assessment done on my small, c. 1975 three-story townhouse in Hyattsville, Md.

My house has a three-year-old SEER 14 HVAC system, insulated replacement vinyl windows, and fairly decent (preexisting) fiberglass insulation. With three months to go in 2009, my electric bill is already $1,655.90. If history is any guide, by the end of the year I will have paid $1,865. And this is with a relatively mild Washington summer.

It’s been a mystery that my electricity bill continued to rise even though I have taken measures to help reduce it. A price hike by my utility provider, Potomac Electric Power Co., is one part of the explanation. But recently I found another: My unsealed and uninsulated attic was literally sucking conditioned air out of the house and money right out of my wallet.

This is partly the reason I’m uncomfortable in my house, why my house is dusty (despite my fastidious efforts), and why my electricity bill for one person was way out of control, says Dan Robinette, a comfort advisor at Minnick’s, a Laurel, Md.-based heating and air-conditioning firm that participates in Maryland’s Home Performance with Energy Star program.

“Most attics are under-insulated and poorly sealed,” says Robinette, who did the assessment of my house. “This is a big problem when it comes to the comfort of the home. These two things affect everything from the temperature in the upper levels, to the air quality, to the number of times your A/C is running in a day. So with a little time and materials and you can get that attic sealed up, insulated, and be on your way to a happy home.”

Robinette’s recommendation? Seal the attic and have 13 inches inches of cellulose blown into the space, which is what I did.

“Air sealing and insulation have a large impact [on a house],” says Amber Wood, program manager for energy efficiency at the NAHB Research Center in Upper Marlboro, Md. “Before anything, you have to seal all penetrations into the attic such as electric boxes, ceiling fans, knee walls, and attic openings, but you have to make sure the soffit vent can ventilate or it can lead to moisture problems.”

Sealing the attic and blowing in insulation—either cellulose or fiberglass—establish the house’s thermal envelope, help prevent air leakage, and help maintain the temperature of the conditioned space below.

“In cold weather, warm air is continually rising,” Denver-based insulation manufacturer Johns Manville says on its Website. “Leaks into the attic allow the expensive, heated air to escape into the attic, while at the same time drawing in cold air to displace it from the basement or other exterior leaks. This continuous air movement makes the home feel drafty and raises energy bills. By sealing attic air leaks, you plug the escape route of rising air and effectively stop the chimney effect.”

Other common sources of attic leaks that Johns Manville says should be checked include: areas between floor joists and behind kneewalls, the attic hatch, wiring holes, plumbing vents, recessed lights, and the furnace flue.

The sealing and insulation of my attic came in at a shade under $1,400. Robinette says—and other consultants agree—that this is typically what it costs. (During my assessment, he also discovered that my house has severely leaky ducts and proposed AeroSeal treatment to have them sealed from the inside out, which he estimated would cost another $1,900.)

André Desjarlais, who manages the building envelopes program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tenn., says Robinette made the right call on my attic. In fact, Desjarlais says people don’t realize just how important the treatment of the attic space is in the overall energy efficiency of a home.

“There are lots of stats,” Desjarlais says. “But let’s take the average home with 2.3 people. Half of the energy bill for that home is used to heat and cool it. Half of the remaining [portion] is due to energy losses through the attic.”

It would be logical to assume that under-insulated attics is a problem largely for older homes, and in some ways this would be an accurate assumption. Older homes tend to be leaky and poorly insulated, and some construction techniques from yesterday may not be appropriate for how homes are built today. “Yes, the older [the homes] get, the worse the problem is,” Robinette says.

But Mike Barcik, senior research engineer and director of technical services at the Southface Energy Institute in Atlanta, says attic inadequacies aren’t only relegated to old homes; many new homes suffer from the same ailments. “I would say 90 percent of all existing homes need some improvement and are probably under-built, including those built two years ago,” Barcik says. “I might even up that to 98 percent.”

The problem with new homes, Barcik continues, is that building inspectors are largely focused on safety, and so a home’s energy usage gets overlooked. “The energy code is a fantastic code if it’s enforced, but it’s not enforced in many states,” he explains. “We have done blower tests to prove it.”

Neglecting the attic seems unthinkable given that it’s relatively cheap to address during construction of the house. Wood says, for example, that a builder may pay about $100 to $500 more in material to seal and insulate an attic. “It’s not that expensive,” she says. “They can do it either with foam and fiberglass, or they can use caulk. Caulking takes more time, but it’s inexpensive.” So the tradeoff is a $500 upfront cost compared to the $1,400 I paid to retrofit my house? That sure sounds like an investment that would be worth considering for new-home buyers and their builders.

by Nigel Maynard

Nigel Maynard is senior editor for products at BUILDER magazine.

http://www.builderonline.com/energy-efficientconstruction/even-smart-builders-continue-to-neglect-the-attic.aspx

www.dvwise.com

National User Facility for Net-Zero Energy Buildings

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory will build and operate a new National User Facility for Net-Zero Energy Buildings using a competitively selected award of $15.9 million in stimulus funds from the U.S. Department of Energy.

This facility will contain a set of test beds for building systems integration designed to address key technical challenges for net-zero energy buildings. The Department of Energy solicited research applications from eligible national laboratories nationwide, which then underwent a thorough technical review process.

Buildings account for more than 40 percent of carbon emissions in the United States. Net-zero energy buildings (N-ZEB) generate as much energy as they use on an annual basis through highly aggressive energy efficiency and on-site renewable energy generation, making them a key pathway to address and reduce these climate-altering emissions. The new laboratory facilities will help researchers develop, test and validate the technologies, systems and design approaches that will allow N-ZEB to be built and operated at an affordable cost.

 ”This facility will serve a national audience-and need-in an aggressive pursuit of DOE’s energy efficiency goals for widespread implementation of affordable net-zero energy buildings by 2030, ” says Stephen Selkowitz, head of the Building Technologies Department of Berkeley Lab’s Environmental Energy Technologies Division.

Berkeley Lab researchers will work with a broad base of users in the building design and construction communities, as well as manufacturers, building owners and operators and the academic community.

In proposing for the N-ZEB award, Berkeley Lab teamed with numerous organizations, including 21 industry partners, three utilities, eight universities, a non-profit and three public agencies, all of whom indicated their support and interest in using the facility. Major partners include the University of California, Berkeley, MIT, Carnegie Mellon, HOK, Flack + Kurtz, Philips Research, Johnson Controls, Lutron, Siemens, the California Energy Commission and the U.S. General Services Administration.

Several Testbeds Planned

The new N-ZEB facility will consist of a series of unique energy-efficient building systems testbeds to be located in new and existing buildings on the Lab. Researchers will be able to change out prototype building systems such as windows, lights, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), energy control systems, roofs and skylights. The basic idea is to conduct initial measurements of energy use and environmental conditions to understand how the systems perform, and then to redesign and optimize their capabilities and performance.

The building systems integration testbed will consist of several large side-by-side research areas. Each area can employ a range of diverse and changeable HVAC systems, lighting, on-site power and process-load solutions, as well as the building’s “envelope” of windows, walls, floors and related fixtures, for real time performance comparisons under dynamic climate conditions.

Other separate testbeds will be constructed for specific buildings subsystems such as lighting systems and controls, and window and façade systems. One testbed will be devoted to the topic of advanced sensor networks and building energy controls, and the communications protocols that link optimized building performance to smart grid initiatives. Final details of the new facilities will be worked out with Department of Energy staff to meet cost targets and schedule deadlines.

Hardware and Software R&D To Be Conducted

The N-ZEB User Facility will be used by scientists to combine a new generation of innovative building materials with components to create high-performance HVAC, controls, lighting, windows and building envelope sub-systems and systems, as well as on-site power systems.

The research teams then will work to integrate these separate building systems into N-ZEB optimized whole-building solutions with the goal of achieving very aggressive energy, demand, carbon and operating cost savings, as well as improved occupant comfort and health. Measured results from physical testing will be enhanced and extended with the use of powerful building simulation tools.

 ”The User Facility will help building industry component and system suppliers to create cost-effective, integrated building systems that deliver the performance required by net-zero energy buildings,” says Mary Ann Piette, deputy head of the Building Technologies Department. “For the owner-designer-specifier community, it will demonstrate and verify that these systems deliver the required energy performance.”

www.oikos.com

www.DVWise.com